Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Liz Haswell's avatar

You write: “Christian nationalism is in no way Christian - except in name alone.”

I have been thinking about this a fair bit lately, and I am not sure it is true. If you take “Christianity” to mean the collective beliefs and actions of people who use that name throughout history, the current encarnation in the US is part of a long and popular tradition. Christians have been a destructive, violent, and self-enriching force since Christianity was made the state religion of Rome in 380 AD.

Of course, those who interpret theology differently, who focus on social justice and liberation, have been there all along! But, I wonder if positioning ourselves as outside of this bloody tradition doesn’t prevent us from seeing the ways that we might be contributing to and benefiting from Christian Nationalism—even in the smallest ways.

I’m not totally sure about this. What do you think?

Kristina Albert's avatar

You've raised some really good points. I personally read the statement as meaning "Christian" = of Christ, and CN is a movement that is not at all based on Christ's teaching or example. Unfortunately, as you said, it is far from the first time professing Christians have done horrible things in the name of Christ.

You're right, it's important for us to be aware of the historical ways Christianity has been used as a weapon or tool for self-serving purposes, because we could start to use it the same way if we're not careful. I think stating that CN is not Christian can be a way to call out not only CN, but also past abuses of power, as being not of Christ. Our dismantling of racist and bigoted assumptions that are core to CN can also involve dismantling the false or downplayed, whitewashed histories we've been taught and acknowledging that what went on was actually wrong and a big deal.

3 more comments...

Ready for more?